Anika G
31-03 2023 19:21
wrote:
Nathan was a kind colleague with genuine integrity. Not only was he passionate about his own work, but he also shared that passionate and attentive ear when learning about and discussing the work of his colleagues. I recall my presentation in our Ph.D. proposal course, where Nathan offered feedback. Although he was critical, he was able to put a positive spin on how his critique could actually be a strength of my research. That’s the type of colleague Nathan was, someone who balanced being constructive with kindness and a positive attitude, who envisioned a better world. I send my sincere condolences to his partner and his family.
Anika G
31-03 2023 19:21
wrote:
Nathan was a kind colleague with genuine integrity. Not only was he passionate about his own work, but he also shared that passionate and attentive ear when learning about and discussing the work of his colleagues. I recall my presentation in our Ph.D. proposal course, where Nathan offered feedback. Although he was critical, he was able to put a positive spin on how his critique could actually be a strength of my research. That’s the type of colleague Nathan was, someone who balanced being constructive with kindness and a positive attitude, who envisioned a better world. I send my sincere condolences to his partner and his family.
